Patent No.: 11,732,745 (get PDF)

Title: Fastener system

Assignee: BPC LG 2 LLC

Abstract: A fastener system including a nut body and a helical thread insert. The nut body having an internally threaded bore containing a plurality of bore threads, and at least one bore obstruction. The helical thread insert formed to create a plurality of internal HTI threads and a plurality of external HTI threads, with the helical thread insert received in the internally threaded bore and not occupying all of the plurality of bore threads, and having its movement limited by the bore obstruction. The helical thread insert having threads with both circular end profiles and a non-circular end profile. The non-circular end profile including at least three straight segments, and located between circular threads.

About Us: I am a patent lawyer with experience in the sporting goods and recreation industries, with a knack for all things related to sports equipment, fitness equipment, and performance improvement gear, including biofeedback inventions. As a mechanical engineer and patent lawyer, I help inventors with freedom-to-operate clearance projects to avoid unintentionally infringing the patents of their competitors, as well as identifying unique protectable aspects of the clients’ inventions and crafting clever claims to cover their inventions and make it as hard as possible for competitors to develop invalidity positions. The art of innovative patent claim creation is difficult, and something that is beyond most patent attorneys who just aren’t that creative. I love the challenge of identifying unusual aspects of an invention and crafting claims directed to these aspects, while carefully viewing them from the perspective of a competitor. As you can see, our IP attorneys are experienced with clever and creative patent claims, and making it difficult for competitors to formulate non-infringement opinions and invalidity opinions. While my intellectual property law firm is located in central Ohio, I regularly travel across the country to meet with clients face to face when they realize protection of an invention is just too important, and the investment in development has been too high, to short change the patent prosecution aspects.